Distance learning tools and services and their ffectiveness for students

Authors

  • S. VADASKA National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38014/osvita.2020.86.09

Keywords:

distance learning, collaborative activities, educational resources, self-directed work

Abstract

Distance learning is a subject discussed and described by many authors. In Ukrainian higher education institutions it is used as a part of blended learning. But in the condition of the pandemic this style of studying has become the only way to train students. The main forms of distance learning appropriate for teaching English for students of technical specialties are considered in the article. The resources that can be particularly useful and effective for the students are presented. In order to diversify the studying process, it is advisably to use several resources taking into account the type and the purpose of the assignments, the students’ proficiency, and the technical facilities of the students. The main disadvantage of distance learning is the lack of communication and collaboration. Thus, it is important to implement he resources which enable the students to interact with each other or to work in small groups. To create the most effective working environment, great attention is paid to the choice of the types of the assignments. Testing of students is another important question that must be solved.

References

Vakhrusheva T.Iu. (2007). Interaktyvni tekhnolohii navchannia yak zasib aktyvizatsii navchalno-piznavalnoi diialnosti studentiv/ T.Iu. Vakhrusheva [Novi tekhnolohii navchannia], K.: Instytut innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii i zmistu osvity. Vyp. 47. 145 s.

Dychkivska I. (2004). Innovatsiini pedahohichni tekhnolohii: navch. posib. / Ilona Dychkivska. K. : Akademvydav. 352 s.

Stefanenko P. (2004). Dydaktychni osoblyvosti dystantsiinoho navchannia u vyshchii shkoli/ P. Stefanenko// Pedahohika i psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity. №1. S.22-23

Tereshchenko N.V. (2012). Intelekt-karty – suchasni innovatsiini sotsialni tekhnolohii navchannia v systemi osvity / N. V. Tereshchenko // Funktsionalna ekonomika. Vcheni zapysky. № 14. S. 139-145.

Vadaska S., Drozdovych N. (2019). Advanced MOODLE tools in teaching Еnglish for specific purposes/ S. Vadaska, N. Drozdovych // Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology. VII (77), Issue: 188. Р.18-21

MacDonald J. (2004). Developing competent e-learners: The role of assessment/ J. MacDonald// Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 29(2). P.215-225

May S. (1993). Collaborative learning: More is not necessarily better/ S. May// The American Journal of Distance Education, Issue: 7(3). P. 39–50

Robson J. (2000). Evaluating On-line Teaching/J. Robson//Journal of Open and Distance Learning. Issue: 15. P.151-172

Simonson M., Smaldino S., Zvacek S. (2014). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education/ M. Simonson, S. Smaldino, S. Zvacek// Information Age Publishing. 350 p.

Tenopir C., King D. (2004). Communication Patterns of Engineers./ C. Tenopir, D. King// Wiley-IEEE Press. 280 p.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-26

How to Cite

VADASKA, S. (2025). Distance learning tools and services and their ffectiveness for students. HIGHER EDUCATION OF UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTEGRATION TO EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL SPACE, 86((I), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.38014/osvita.2020.86.09

Issue

Section

NEW TOOLS OF TEACHING AND EDUCATION: PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION AND STANDARDIZAT