Some barriers to inclusive education in Ukraine: interdisciplinary analysis

I. NECHITAILO; Yu. ALEKSANDROV; M. KALAMKOVIĆ

doi:10.38014/osvita.2020.86.04

Autor

I. NECHITAILO Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine
Yu. ALEKSANDROV Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine
M. KALAMKOVIĆ Primary and Secondary School «Milan Petrovic», Novi Sad, Serbia

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.38014/osvita.2020.86.04

Słowa kluczowe:

social inclusion, barriers of educational inclusion, disabled people, inclusive education, school, university

Abstrakt

The article is dedicated to educational inclusion. It is emphasized that educational inclusion is an integral part of European educational systems, since it provides everyone with equal opportunities to study in regular (non-specialized) schools, as well as universities, regardless of their physical, intellectual, social, linguistic and other features. The article carries out an interdisciplinary (at the intersection of sociology, psychology and pedagogy) analysis of the barriers to inclusive education that exist in modern Ukrainian society. Such barriers as institutional, architectural, technological and behavioral are described. The results of an empirical research conducted by the authors using the in-depth interview method are presented. It is concluded that the most pronounced and difficult to overcome are the behavioral barriers of educational inclusion.

Bibliografia

Bazilenko, A. & Utkina, Y. (2019). Porіvnyal’na harakteristika stanu socіal’noї roboti u sferі formuvannya bat’kіvs’koї kompetentnostі u sіm’yah, de vihovuyut’sya dіti z іnvalіdnіstyu: Litva ta Ukraїna [Comparative characteristics of social work status in the area of parental competence in families with children with disabilities: Lithuania and Ukraine]. An inclusive education environment: challenges, prospects and best practices: Сollection of materials of the ХIХ international scientific and practical conference (207-210). Kyiv: Univ. «Ukraine».

Bojko, V. O. (2012). Іnklyuzivna osvіta: do pitannya viznachennya ponyattya ta osoblivostej її zaprovadzhennya [Inclusive education: the question of defining the concept and features of its introduction]. Psychological and pedagogical sciences, № 4, 4-8.

Budnikova, E.S. & Reznikova, E.V. (2017). Realizaciya inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya v obrazovatel’noj organizacii [The implementation of inclusive education in an educational organization]. Chelyabinsk: Publishing House “Tsitsero”.

Coriale, L., Larson, G., Robertson, J. (2012): Exploring the educational experience of a social work student with a disability: A Narrative. Social Work Education, 31(4), 422-434.

Darrow, A. A. (2009). Barriers to effective inclusion and strategies to overcome them. General Music Today, 22(3), 29-31.

Dіkova-Favorska, O. M. (2019). Pedagogіka partnerstva yak peredumova uspіshnoї realіzacії koncepcії іnklyuzії [Partnership pedagogy as a precondition for successful implementation of the concept of inclusion]. Collection of materials of scientific-practical conference «Partnership pedagogy as a basis for development of subjects of educational activity in the conditions of the new Ukrainian school» / ed. by OV Kosigina. Zhytomyr: Municipal Institution «Zhytomyr Regional Boarding School of Teacher Education».

Fillips, S.D. (2018). Invalidnost’ i mobil’noe grazhdanstvo v postsovetskoj Ukraine [Disability and mobile citizenship in post-Soviet Ukraine]. Kharkiv: V.I. Karazin Kharkiv National University.

Hemmingson, H., Borell, L. (2002). Environmental barriers in mainstream schools. Child: Care,Health & Development, 28(1), 57–63.

Hevko, I. V. (2018). Znachennia innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii pry zdiisnenni inkliuzyvnoi osvity [The Importance of Innovative Technologies in the Implementation of Inclusive Education]. Pedagogical Almanac: Collection of Communal Higher Educational Institutions Kherson Academy of Continuing Education, Kherson Regional Council, 37, 236-240.

Hodanich, L. (2019). Inklyuzivna osvіta u svіtlі problem gumanіzmu [Inclusive education in light of the problems of humanism]. Retrieved from: http://www.zakinppo.org.ua /?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zakinppo.org.ua%2Fkabineti%2Fkabinet-vihovnoi-roboti%2Finkljuzivna-osvita%2F1181-inkljuzivna-osvita-u-svitli-problem-gumanizmu43.

Malofeev, N. N., Nikol’skaya, O. S. & Kukushkina, O. I. (2010). Deti s otkloneniyami v razvitii v obshcheobrazovatel’noj shkole: obshchie i special’nye trebovaniya k rezul’tatam obucheniya [Children with developmental disabilities in a comprehensive school: general and special requirements for learning outcomes]. Defectology, 5, 14-20.

Marković, S., Kalamković, M., Mazurkijević, J. (2010). Asistivne tehnologije u nastavi, specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji, ŠOSO „Milan Petrović”[Assistive technologies for mentoring, special education and rehabilitation at the specialized school «Milan Petrovich»](21-30). Novi Sad: “Milan Petrović”.

Marshak, L., Van Wieren, T., Raeke Ferrell, D., Swiss, L., Dugan, C. (2010) Barriers to use of accommodations. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22(3), 151-165.

Mironova, S. & Zaval’nyuk, O. (2011). Stavlennya studentіv і pedagogіv do problem іnklyuzivnoї osvіti dіtej z porushennyami psihofіzichnogo rozvitku [Attitudes of Students and Educators to the Problems of Inclusive Education of Children with Disorders of Psychophysical Development]. Defectology, 1, 8-17.

Nechitailo, I. S. (2011). Rol’ universiteta v opredelenii professional’nyh perspektiv studentov [The role of the university in determining the social prospects of its graduates]. In University graduate in the modern sociocultural space: monograph / ed. by E. Podolskaya (pp. 160–252). Kharkov : Publishing House of the PUA.

Nechitailo, I. S. (2017). Rol’ obrazovaniya v ustanovlenii samoorganizacionnogo social’nogo poryadka [The role of education in the establishment of a selforganizing social order]. Science-Theoretical and Public-Political Almanac «Grani», №11 (151), 34-41.

Newcomer, P. L., Barenbaum, E. M. (1991). The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980 to 1990. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 578-593;

Ontario Human Rights Commission. The Opportunity to Succeed: Achieving Barrier-Free Education for Students with Disabilities. Consultation Report (October 2003). Cited in University of Toronto Scarborough, Universal Instructional Design, Creating an Accessible Curriculum, AccessAbility, Teaching and Learning Services.

Pivik, J., Mccomas, J., Laflamme, M. (2002). Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education. Exceptional Children, 69 (1), 97-107.

Taranchenko, O. (2011). Tendencії suchasnoї osvіti: rol’ pedagoga u stvorennі efektivnoї іnklyuzivnoї shkoli [Trends in Contemporary Education: The Role of the Educator in Creating an Effective Inclusive School]. Defectology, 1, 18-24.

Zaichenko N.A. & Sapunova I.V. (2018). Geterogennost’ i inklyuziya v predstavleniyah pedagogov i rukovoditelej obrazovatel’nyh organizacij [Heterogeneity and inclusion in the views of educators and heads of educational organizations]. Inclusion in Education, 2(10). 56-73.

Zajcev, D. V. & Selivanova, Y. V. (2018). Inklyuzivnaya paradigma sovremennogo obrazovaniya v Rossii: regional’naya specifika realizacii [The inclusive paradigm of modern education in Russia: regional specificity of implementation]. Humanities. Scientific and practical journal, 2 (42), 37-43.

Zdragat, S. G. (2018). Evalyuacіya іnklyuzivnoї osvіti: socіal’na tekhnologіya її realіzacії v ukraїns’komu osvіtn’omu prostorі : avtoref. dis. kand. soc. nauk: 22.00.04 [Evolution of inclusive education: social technology of its implementation in the Ukrainian educational space: autoref. diss. сand. soc. sciences: 22.00.04]. Zaporіzhzhya: Klassical Privat University.