Philosophical understanding of reflection: historical and systematic analysis

Autor

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.38014/osvita.2024.94.15

Słowa kluczowe:

reflection, philosophical methodology, self-consciousness, existence, phenomenology, epistemological function, Cartesianism, German classical philosophy

Abstrakt

This paper presents a comprehensive historical and philosophical analysis of reflection as a fundamental principle of philosophical thinking from antiquity to non-classical philosophy of the twentieth century. Through systematic analysis of primary sources and contemporary research, the study traces the evolution of reflection from Socratic self-knowledge through Cartesian methodological doubt to Husserl’s phenomenology and existential philosophy. The research employs historical-philosophical, systematic, hermeneutical, and comparative approaches to examine how the understanding of reflection has transformed across different  philosophical traditions. The paper demonstrates that reflection serves both as an ontological characteristic of consciousness and as a methodological tool for philosophical inquiry. The ontological and epistemological status of reflection in the history of philosophical thought is revealed through analysis of key philosophical systems and their interpretations of reflexive thinking. The specific features of reflection interpretation in different historical epochs are analyzed, revealing its significance for the development of philosophical knowledge and human self-consciousness. Special attention is paid to the transformation of reflection understanding in contemporary philosophical discourse and its role in interdisciplinary research. The research methodology combines traditional historiographical analysis with modern interpretative approaches, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of reflection’s evolving conceptualization. The study examines the role of reflection in modern educational practices and its potential for developing critical thinking and metacognitive skills. The methodological significance of reflection for integrating different forms of knowledge and bridging disciplinary boundaries is thoroughly analyzed. The scientific novelty lies in synthesizing various approaches to reflection and identifying its methodological potential for contemporary humanitarian knowledge. The practical significance of this work is in demonstrating how reflective methodology can enhance modern philosophical discourse, educational practices, and research methodologies in the humanities.

Bibliografia

Vasylieva O.S. (2018). Dukhovnist ta dukhovnyi svit osobystosti [Spirituality and spiritual world of personality]. Ukrainske relihiieznavstvo, 27-28, 14-22. [in Ukrainian].

Horskyi V.S. (2019). Istoriia ukrainskoi filosofii [History of Ukrainian Philosophy]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.

Zaluzhna A.Ye. (2020). Ekzystentsiinyi analiz Dasein ta problema istyny buttia [Existential analysis of Dasein and the problem of truth of being]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv, 4, 3-7.

Yolon P. (2021). Fenomenolohichne traktuvannia obiektiv nauky u filosofii [Phenomenological interpretation of objects of science in philosophy]. Filosofski dialohy, 15, 169-180.

Malivskyi A.M. (2020). Dekartivske osmyslennia pryrody liudyny [Cartesian understanding of human nature]. Antropolohichni vymiry filosofskykh doslidzhen, 23, 142-150.

Rozova T.V., Chorna L.V. (2019). Filosofska systema Hehelia yak vchennia pro etapy rozvytku Absoliutnoi Idei [Hegel’s philosophical system as a doctrine about stages of development of the Absolute Idea]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk, 93, 226-230.

Chorna L.V. (2020). Kulturo-tvorche osiahnennia liudyny u filosofii [Cultural and creative understanding of human in philosophy]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk, 72, 658-664.

Shenherii L.M. (2021). Produkuvannia pryntsypiv standartyzatsii znannia v dorobku Arystotelia [Production of knowledge standardization principles in Aristotle’s works]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu, 2, 8-12.

Opublikowane

2024-12-30