Method of content and language integrated learning in the process of the formation of linguo-cultural competence of students of Higher educational establishments of Ukraine and China

LI WEIHUA

doi:10.38014/osvita.2019.84.22

LI WEIHUA Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Starobilsk, Ukraine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.38014/osvita.2019.84.22

Ключевые слова: content and language integrated learning (CLIL), linguo-cultural competence, students of higher educational establishments of Ukraine and China, pedagogical principles, innovative methods of teaching

Аннотация

The article deals with the analysis of the pedagogical potential of the method of content and language integrated learning in the process of the formation of the linguo-cultural competence of students of higher educational institutions of Ukraine and China. The author arrives at the conclusion that the proposed method of content and language integrated learning is efficient in the activization of the process of acquiring of the linguo-cultural competence of students of higher educational establishments on the basis of an active integration of a foreign language with the process of teaching of professionally significant disciplines. It is proved in the article that the contentand language integrated learning if used on a regular basis contributes to the increase of motivation and the key mechanism of the activization of the process of teaching foreign languages to students of non-linguistic higher educational establishments because their attention is automatically paid to the interesting, new and rich in content linguistic material.

Литература

Aksyonova I. N. (2017). Peculiarities of usage of ICT by students while learning a foreign language in a non-linguistic higher educational establishment (based on the example of WhatsApp). Modern linguistic education: innovations, problems, solutions: Collection of scientific articles. Issue 6. Moscow. PP. 8–13. (in Russian).

Borshchova V. V. (2015). Technology of М-Learning for the formation of academic autonomy of students at a non-linguistic higher educational establishment. Modern linguistic education: innovations, problems, solutions:

Collection of scientific articles. Issue 2. Moscow. PP. 75–78. (in Russian).

Borshchova O. V. (2015). Blog-techologies at the lessons of a foreign language. Modern linguistic education: innovations, problems, solutions: Collection of scientific articles. Issue 2. Moscow. PP. 79–81. (in Russian).

Vygotsky L. S. (2005). Psychology of a man’s development. URL: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/psycho/vugotskiy-psc_razv_chel-8-konkretnaya_psihologiya_cheloveka.pdf. (in Rusian).

Grigorieva K. S., Salekhova L. L. (2014). Realization of principles of contentlanguage integrated learning with the help of Web 2.0 technologies in a technical higher educational establishment. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series “Informatization of education”. No. 2. PP. 11– 19. (in Russian).

Salekhova L. L., Grigorieva K. S. (2013). Content and Language Integrated Learning as a basis of the formation of the professional foreign lanfuage competence of students of technical higher educational establishments. Foreign language for professional purposes: traditions and innovations: Collection of articles of the 2nd correspondence Republican symposium. Kazan : K(P)FU. PP. 89–94. (in Russian).

Chekun O. A. (2017). Innovative methods in professional foreign language training of master’s degree students. Modern linguistic education: innovations, problems, solutions: Collection of scientific articles. Issue 6. Moscow. PP. 45–49. (in Russian).

Yakovenko I. A. (2017). The use of cloud servers in teaching foreign languages. Modern linguistic education: innovations, problems, solutions: Collection of scientific articles. Issue 6. Moscow. PP. 49–54. (in Russian).

Ball Ph. (2015). What is CLIL? URL: http://www.onestopenglish.com/clil/methodology/articles/article-what-is-clil/500453.article

Bentley K. (2010). The TKT Course CLIL Module. Cambridge University Press.

Bloom B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain New York: McKay.

Coyle D., Hood, P., Marsh D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cummins J. (1984). Bilingualism and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Darn S. (2017). Content and Language Integrated Learning. URL: http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articles/content-language-integrated-learning.

Graddol D. (2016). English Next, British Council Publications. URL: http://www.britishcouncil.org/learning-research-englishnext.htm.

Krashen S. (2019). Theory of Second Language Acquisition. URL: http://www.sk.com.br/sk-krash-english.html.

Marsh D. (2002). Content and Language Integrated Learning: The European Dimension – Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Cambridge University Press. 552 p.

Moghadam N. Z., Fatemipour H. (2014). The Effect of CLIL on Vocabulary Development by Iranian Secondary School EFL Learners. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814027268.

Piaget J. (1965). The Origins of Itelligence in Children. URL: http://www.pitt.edu/~strauss/origins_r.pdf.

Wielander E. (2014). Something to talk about: Integrating content and language study in higher education. URL: https://www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/22-01-2014/wielander_what_is_clil-clil_at_aston_university.pdf.